White papers, exploit evidence, validation posture, and architectural references for reviewers, partners, and prospective design partners.
These are public documents intended to explain the architecture, terminology, and boundary conditions without disclosing internal-only evaluation materials.
From Implicit Execution to Explicit Control. A unified treatment of IVD-N and IVD-ACP as complementary disciplines, with formal definitions for whether inputs should be trusted, compact traffic fingerprints, grouped attack objects, and repeatable enforcement outcomes after policy evaluation. Includes representative IVD-N FlowSpec expression and IVD-ACP decision trace examples.
Download PDFPre-Execution Control Planes for AI and Software Supply Chains. Focused treatment of IVD-ACP covering AI-generated actions, software dependencies, scripts, and administrative commands. Direct application to recent supply-chain compromise events including the March 2026 Axios npm compromise.
Download PDFThese materials are architectural mapping examples for reviewer orientation. They are not claims of production deployment, prevention, or incident-specific validation.
These cards are architectural mapping examples, not evidence cards. They show how current exploit classes map to IVD-N or IVD-ACP response surfaces, while test evidence is summarized separately on the Federal Evaluation and Technology pages.
View libraryThese references explain current validation posture, what qualified evaluators can review, and how the public claims are scoped.
Controlled-environment validation evidence, TRL-7-oriented independent testing underway with Gear Six Labs, pending federal lab pathway, and scoped evaluation boundaries.
ReviewThe IVD architecture as observation, correlation, policy, enforcement, identity, and audit layers, and how distributed behavior is reduced into limited policy action.
ReadTwo filed United States non-provisional utility applications covering the dual-prong defense architecture, anchored to a November 2025 provisional priority document.
ReviewSecondary background on cost asymmetry, signal extraction, limited decisions, and earlier control points.
ReadIVD maintains controlled-environment evidence materials for qualified technical review, including validation summaries, structured audit logs, policy decision records, rule lifecycle records, quarantine and event records, methodology notes, and hash-anchored evidence bundles. Public excerpts are intended to explain scope and method; they are not a substitute for full technical diligence.
Current maturity posture: IVD has controlled-environment validation evidence supporting a TRL-6-style posture within its tested scope. TRL-7-oriented independent testing is underway with Gear Six Labs, a European third-party software testing lab, with completion targeted for June 25, 2026. Federal lab evaluation remains a separate pending pathway and has not yet been completed.
References to Gear Six Labs describe the current independent testing pathway and do not indicate completed TRL-7 validation until the final testing report is complete.
Use the IP Status, Federal Evaluation, and Technology validation sections together when reviewing what is filed, what has been tested, what is underway, and what is not claimed.
Direct federal engagement materials, including scenario-specific technical memoranda, are not posted publicly. Qualified reviewers can request access through the contact channel and will be routed to the appropriate intake path.
